Read-only view: browsing is open, changes need a signed-in user.
Staging: test environment for new releases. Data may be reset; do not share from here.
Feed
Salv·
13 Jul 2021
L2 · Minor
Salv states that Bridge's first message occurred on 13 July 2021 in Estonia, with a phishing pattern flagged and €45,000 kept out of criminal hands.
Five years of banks sharing fraud and AML data in real time: what changed ↗
What happened
- Salv reports the Bridge network spans banks across 16+ countries.
- Salv reports banks have collaborated on 75,000+ joint investigations and run 200,000+ joint screening queries across 16+ countries.
- Salv reports an 84% true-positive rate for fraud cases shared through Bridge, a median bank-to-bank response time of 17 minutes, and roughly 80% of cases seeing at least partial fund recovery.
- Salv states AMLR Article 75 brings mandatory AML information-sharing from July 2027, and PSR Article 83a is expected to bring equivalent fraud sharing from early 2028.
Why it matters to Signicat
- Salv's claimed AML and fraud sharing volumes and rates are vendor-reported, uncorroborated figures, so they should not be treated as independently established.
Evidence from the source (5 quotes)
- “now spans banks across 16+ countries, including a dedicated cross-border cluster serving a pan-European and UK fintech group.” source ↗
- “banks have collaborated on 75,000+ joint investigations spanning fraud, sanctions and AML, and run 200,000+ joint screening queries.” source ↗
- “Fraud cases shared through Bridge carry an 84% true-positive rate. The median response time from one bank to another sits at 17 minutes. Roughly 80% of cases see at least partial fund recovery.” source ↗
- “AMLR Article 75 brings mandatory AML information-sharing from July 2027, and PSR Article 83a is expected to bring the equivalent for fraud from early 2028, once the final transitional arrangements are confirmed.” source ↗
- “Fraud cases shared through Bridge carry an 84% true-positive rate.” source ↗
AML KYB screeningPositioning narrativeThought leadershipNordicsGlobal
5 of 5 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5
Salv·
first seen 31 Oct 2026 (date unconfirmed)
L2 · Minor
Salv presented its product roadmap for Q4 2025 to Q3 2026 in a customer webinar.
The road ahead: How Salv is evolving screening, monitoring and risk ↗
What happened
- The roadmap lists planned case creation that groups related alerts, transactions and entities, with export for reporting.
- Salv plans an AI Alert Assistant that gathers context behind an alert and presents a summary.
- Salv plans a no-code scenario builder for Monitoring and segments integrated into Risk rules.
Evidence from the source (3 quotes)
- “Case creation, a much-requested feature, allows teams to group related alerts, transactions and entities in one place, set priorities and deadlines, and export the results for reporting.” source ↗
- “AI Alert Assistant will automatically gather the relevant context behind an alert and present a summary, helping analysts start investigations faster.” source ↗
- “A no-code scenario builder will be added to Monitoring, reducing reliance on SQL or JMESPath.” source ↗
AML KYB screeningOrchestration platformFeature updateThought leadershipGlobal
4 of 4 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5
Salv·
first seen 31 Oct 2026 (date unconfirmed)
L2 · Minor
Article reports a November 2025 political agreement between the European Parliament and Council on a new Payment Services Regulation and third Payment Services Directive.
APP fraud has no borders, Europe's regulation is starting to reflect that ↗
What happened
- The political agreement includes mandatory reimbursement for victims of impersonation fraud, limited to personal, non-corporate accounts.
- The article states the formal legal text has not yet been published or formally adopted.
- The article reports that payment service institutions will be required to connect to shared data infrastructure to share fraud-related intelligence.
- The article reports a limited platform liability provision where online platforms can be held liable if informed of fraudulent content and failing to remove it.
Why it matters to Signicat
- Mandatory data-sharing infrastructure under the PSR could create demand for fraud-intelligence platforms adjacent to Signicat's risk and AML screening line; Signicat's exposure is not established by the article.
- Article is a vendor-authored thought piece from Salv promoting Salv Bridge; its claims about market demand are vendor-attributed, not independently verified.
Evidence from the source (6 quotes)
- “The political agreement includes mandatory reimbursement for victims of impersonation fraud, where a criminal poses as a payment service provider to trick a customer into approving a transfer.” source ↗
- “The formal legal text has not yet been published or formally adopted, but there is some consensus forming based on what has been revealed so far.” source ↗
- “Payment service institutions will be required to connect to shared data infrastructure — specifically to technology providers who operate the exchange platforms — to share fraud-related intelligence with each other.” source ↗
- “online platforms can be held liable where they are informed of fraudulent content and fail to remove it.” source ↗
- “We're not talking about regtechs as products anymore. We're talking about an infrastructure layer which is set into the PSR, which is cross-European law.” source ↗
- “Salv Bridge is the fraud intelligence infrastructure connecting European institutions.” source ↗
AML KYB screeningThought leadershipGlobal
5 of 5 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5