Idura states that Sikker Samtale moves the identity check from control questions to MitID or MobilePay during the call.
Vi har allerede et alternativ til CPR. Brug MitID eller MobilePay til at verificere dine kunder ↗
What happened
- The product flow sends a MitID request to the customer's phone and the customer approves it, after which the agent receives confirmation of the caller's identity.
- The article says the incident was discovered on 2 October and affected around 8.8 million people.
- Idura states that Sikker Samtale is sold as a plugin for existing systems.
Why it matters to Signicat
- Idura targets Danish call-centre identity checks using MitID, a Nordic eID route where Signicat competes via eID brokering and MitID-based verification.
- The post pairs MitID with MobilePay as a second route, which widens Idura's Danish eID-based offer beyond MitID alone.
- The article is competitor marketing that frames CPR-based checks as unsafe during a national data-breach news cycle, amplifying urgency for MitID-based call verification.
Evidence from the source (6 quotes)
- “Kunden godkender med MitID, og medarbejderen får bekræftet, at det er den rigtige person.” source ↗
- “Hændelsen blev opdaget den 2. oktober, og omkring 8,8 millioner personer er ramt.” source ↗
- “Sikker Samtalen er ganske enkelt et plugin, I kan købe til jeres eksisterende system.” source ↗
- “Sikker Samtale fra Idura flytter identitetstjekket fra kontrolspørgsmål til MitID eller MobilePay, mens samtalen foregår.” source ↗
- “Har I brug for en stærk identitetskontrol, men uden den ekstra sikkerhed som MitID giver, så kan I også bruge MobilePay til at verificere jeres kunder.” source ↗
- “Drop CPR. Brug MitID eller MobilePay i stedet.” source ↗
Authentication passwordlesseID brokeringPositioning narrativeData sovereignty privacyProduct launchThought leadershipNordics
4 of 5 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5