BioCatch's blog argues that device recognition is no longer sufficient and that banks should continuously validate device integrity, environment and behavior during sessions.
How remote access fraud and AI have broken traditional device trust ↗
What happened
- The blog states that BioCatch's mid-market customers reported a 55% increase in fraud involving remote access Trojans in 2025, accounting for 15% of total fraud.
- The blog cites FTC data reporting $15.9 billion in U.S. consumer fraud losses in 2025, more than a 27% increase from the prior year.
Why it matters to Signicat
- Device-trust messaging targets the device-recognition layer that Signicat's authentication and risk offerings also rely on; the article is positioning, not a named attack on Signicat.
Evidence from the source (3 quotes)
- “BioCatch’s mid-market customers reported a 55% increase in fraud involving remote access Trojans in 2025, accounting for 15% of total fraud.” source ↗
- “The FTC reported $15.9 billion in U.S. consumer fraud losses in 2025, more than a 27% increase from the year before.” source ↗
- “banks need to ask, “Who or what is actually in control of it?”” source ↗
Fraud deepfake injectionAuthentication passwordlessPositioning narrativeThought leadershipGlobal
3 of 3 facts verified against the source · confidence high · claude-haiku-5-5