Read-only view: browsing is open, changes need a signed-in user.
Staging: test environment for new releases. Data may be reset; do not share from here.
WatchtowerSignicat competitor intelligence

Feed

Reset
Skribble· first seen 31 Oct 2026 (date unconfirmed) L2 · Minor

Skribble published a comparison page naming DeepSign as an alternative and presenting feature tables for both vendors.

Skribble as an alternative to DeepSign: a comparison ↗

What happened

  • The comparison table is labeled as data as of November 2024.
  • The page states that Skribble offers a free trial and that DeepSign does not.
  • The page reports a survey of 120 decision-makers at Skribble client companies with user-friendliness cited by 68%.

Why it matters to Signicat

  • Comparison page names a competitor and frames DeepSign's ecosystem integration as a drawback; this is a direct competitive attack on a Swiss e-signature rival rather than on Signicat.
  • Signicat's e-signing line competes on the same QES/AES/SES standards and Swiss hosting claims; the page targets Swiss e-signature buyers, a segment adjacent to Signicat's DACH market.
Evidence from the source (5 quotes)
  • “(Data as of: November 2024)” source ↗
  • “| Try for free | Available | Not available | ” source ↗
  • “We asked 120 decision-makers in the companies of our clients. The 5 most frequently mentioned selection criteria were: User-friendliness (68%)” source ↗
  • “for companies with diverse software solutions, this close integration can present challenges.” source ↗
  • “E-Signature in Switzerland: Skribble as an alternative to DeepSign” source ↗
eSign trust servicesPositioning narrativeCompetitive attackDACH

4 of 4 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5