The article discusses Italian Court of Cassation order n° 20945/2026, which held that approving a clause in an online contract by two ticked checkboxes was insufficient.
Contrats numériques : 6 façons de valider les clauses abusives ↗
What happened
- The article states that the Court cited a one-time code sent by SMS or email as an example of a suitable approach.
Why it matters to Signicat
- Content is thought leadership on e-signature evidence for consent; relevant to Signicat's electronic signing and trust services lines, but not a Namirial product launch.
- Namirial uses the ruling to position its Sign Enterprise and Sign Personal products as the illustration for the six approval scenarios.
Evidence from the source (3 quotes)
- “la Cour cite la saisie d’un code à usage unique envoyé par SMS ou par e-mail” source ↗
- “Nous les illustrons à l’aide des solutions de signature de Namirial” source ↗
- “Namirial Sign Enterprise (NSE) pour la signature à distance et en entreprise, et Namirial Sign Personal pour un usage individuel” source ↗
eSign trust servicesPositioning narrativeThought leadershipDACH
2 of 2 facts verified against the source · confidence medium · claude-haiku-5-5