Read-only view: browsing is open, changes need a signed-in user.
Staging: test environment for new releases. Data may be reset; do not share from here.
WatchtowerSignicat competitor intelligence

Feed

Reset
Incode· 31 Aug 2026 L3 · Notable

Incode says it ranked among top performers in DHS S&T RIVR Track 3, which evaluates presentation attack detection and liveness.

Incode among top performers in DHS S&T RIVR Track 3 presentation attack detection ↗

What happened

  • Incode states it achieved the second-lowest APCER among evaluated systems in the passive liveness track while meeting DHS BPCER and average run time thresholds.
  • Incode states it met 3 out of 4 DHS performance thresholds in the active liveness track.
  • Incode states it was identified as PAD-P1 in published DHS results for the passive liveness track.
  • Incode states it became the first company to achieve iBeta PAD Level 3 conformance on both iOS and Android in early 2026.

Why it matters to Signicat

  • Independent government-run liveness results give Incode a benchmark claim that Signicat's document IDV and liveness positioning must answer in Track 3-type evaluations.
  • Incode's own text notes results reflect a fixed configuration and that APCER reports the worst attack subtype; buyers should read full MdTF results rather than the headline.
Evidence from the source (6 quotes)
  • “In the passive liveness track, Incode achieved the second-lowest attack presentation classification error rate (APCER) among evaluated systems, while meeting DHS thresholds for bona fide user accuracy (BPCER) and average run time.” source ↗
  • “In the active liveness track, Incode met 3 out of 4 DHS performance thresholds.” source ↗
  • “In the passive liveness track, Incode is identified as PAD-P1 in the published DHS results.” source ↗
  • “In early 2026, Incode became the first company to achieve iBeta PAD Level 3 conformance on both iOS and Android, with 0% APCER and 0% BPCER.” source ↗
  • “Incode ranked among the top performers in Track 3, which evaluates presentation attack detection and liveness.” source ↗
  • “The published APCER for a given system reflects the single worst-performing attack subtype within the worst-performing attack class.” source ↗
Document IDV biometricsFraud deepfake injectionAwardThought leadershipGlobal

5 of 5 facts verified against the source · confidence high · claude-haiku-5-5